Re: Atomic operations for PA

[Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>]

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 12:50:20PM -0600, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> >The patch has been tested on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, hppa2.0-hp-hpux11*,
> >and hppa64-hp-hpux11*.  There are no regressions and under hppa-linux
[...]
> >+  hppa*)
> >+    cpu_include_dir="cpu/hppa"
> >+    ;;
> >   m680[246]0)
> >     cpu_include_dir="cpu/m68k"
> >     ;;
> 
> This is the default. I don't think you need this part (see ia64, which
> also doesn't need this part.)

I was thinking the same thing, but doesn't it also have to match hppa2.0 and
hppa64 as cpu names?  The default would look for three different directories.


Phil

-- 
I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How
not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met.
                                                 - Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002