This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: More SH patches for the 3.2 branch
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 10:49:30AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
> >Are these OK?
>
> Are they regressions?
>
> If so, it's OK to move them to the branch. If not, it's not OK.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:50:37PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I think that this patch should be moved to the branch:
>
> # Subject: bug fix for calls.c:expand_call
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-04/msg01448.html
>
> Without it we miscompile expr.c:store_constructor_fields by creating an
> illegal sibcall to store_field. The resulting GCC will run, but crashes on
> any call to store_constructor_field.
This one is a regression. I've committed it.
> While searching the archives for that patch, I also noticed:
>
> # Subject: bug fix for loop.c:load_mems
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-04/msg01447.html
>
> which also looks like a good candidate for the branch.
I think this one is also but I don't have a testcase for it, so I left
it out.
Thanks, Mark.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer