This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [c++] warn if NULL is passed through varargs

From: Lars Brinkhoff <lars dot spam at nocrew dot org>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Cc: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>, "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 11 Oct 2002 08:48:59 +0200
Subject: Re: [c++] warn if NULL is passed through varargs
Organization: nocrew
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210092104580.9652-100000@wotan.suse.de><85adllbi4l.fsf@junk.nocrew.org><or7kgpv5kc.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:
> On Oct 11, 2002, Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> wrote:
> > Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> writes:
> >> Which machine which is supported by gcc has a different
> >> representation of different pointer types (in C please).
> > The PDP-10 port (not supported in the official GCC tree) has different
> > representations for pointers to words and pointer to bytes.  E.g.
> > "int *" and "char *" are different.
> But are the binary representations of their NULLs different from
> all-zeros?

No.

-- 
Lars Brinkhoff          http://lars.nocrew.org/     Linux, GCC, PDP-10,
Brinkhoff Consulting    http://www.brinkhoff.se/    HTTP programming

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [c++] warn if NULL is passed through varargs
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- Re: [c++] warn if NULL is passed through varargs
  - From: Michael Matz
- Re: [c++] warn if NULL is passed through varargs
  - From: Lars Brinkhoff
- Re: [c++] warn if NULL is passed through varargs
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]