Re: unreviewed doc patch

[Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>]

On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 01:35:46PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:26:50AM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > +For example, to use a version of the GCC C++ library that is
> > +compatible with the GCC 3.2 release, the compile line for a different
> > +C++ compiler needs to include
> > +
> > +@example
> > +    -I@var{gcc_install_directory}/include/c++/3.2
> > +@end example
> 
> ...as modified by configure flags --with-gxx-include-dir and/or
> --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs.

This just gets messier and messier!  How about something like:

  The location of GCC's C++ header files depends on how the GCC build
  was configured, but can be seen by using the G++ @option{-v} option.
  With default configuration options for G++ 3.2 the compile line for
  a different C++ compiler needs to include

For mainline this would have the default location for GCC 3.3.

Apparently there isn't a -print option that shows the location of
header files; if there is and I missed it, I'll use that instead of
-v.

Janis