This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: unreviewed doc patch
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 01:35:46PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:26:50AM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > +For example, to use a version of the GCC C++ library that is
> > +compatible with the GCC 3.2 release, the compile line for a different
> > +C++ compiler needs to include
> > +
> > +@example
> > + -I@var{gcc_install_directory}/include/c++/3.2
> > +@end example
>
> ...as modified by configure flags --with-gxx-include-dir and/or
> --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs.
This just gets messier and messier! How about something like:
The location of GCC's C++ header files depends on how the GCC build
was configured, but can be seen by using the G++ @option{-v} option.
With default configuration options for G++ 3.2 the compile line for
a different C++ compiler needs to include
For mainline this would have the default location for GCC 3.3.
Apparently there isn't a -print option that shows the location of
header files; if there is and I missed it, I'll use that instead of
-v.
Janis