This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

PATCH: Revert part of c++ change (Re: Does gcc 3.2 branch bootstrap on RedHat 7.3?)


On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 09:55:51AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 09:47:24AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 09:45:56AM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 11:59:22PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > > With Thu Oct  3 23:25:02 PDT 2002's 3.2 branch, I got
> > > > 
> > > > /export/build/gnu/gcc-3.2/build-i686-linux/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/stl_rope.h:609: no
> > > >    type named `allocator_type' in `struct __gnu_cxx::_Rope_rep_base<char, 
> > > >    std::allocator<char> >'
> > > 
> > > I got the same failure last night on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu with the
> > > 3.2 branch.
> > > 
> > 
> > Mark, Andreas has identified your patch breaks both mainline and 3.2:
> > 
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-10/msg00231.html
> > 
> > Shouldn't we revert it at least on the 3.2 branch?
> > 
> 
> Since Mark is out of office from October 3rd through October 7th, I
> guess someone else has to fix/revert the 3.2 branch. If noone does
> before 11pm PDT Oct. 4, 2002, I will do it.
> 

I checked in the patch enclosed here to the the 3.2 branch. The test
result is at

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-10/msg00119.html

2002-10-04  H.J. Lu  (hjl@gnu.org)

	* pt.c (tsubst_decl, case VAR_DECL): Back out the last change.
	(tsubst_expr, case DECL_STMT): Likewise.


H.J.

Attachment: gcc-mark-c++.patch
Description: Text document


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]