This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

cpplib: Fix funlike macros and -Wtraditional


>From my testing, this patch has the desired behaviour in all cases, as
far as I can see.

I'll commit it after bootstrap.  Testcase updated.

Neil.

	* cppmacro.c: Don't warn about function-like macros without
	'(' during pre-expandion.
testsuite:
	* gcc.dg/cpp/tr-warn2.c: Update.

Index: gcc/cppmacro.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/cppmacro.c,v
retrieving revision 1.122
diff -u -p -r1.122 cppmacro.c
--- gcc/cppmacro.c	7 Aug 2002 21:47:47 -0000	1.122
+++ gcc/cppmacro.c	20 Sep 2002 18:20:55 -0000
@@ -1032,10 +1032,15 @@ expand_arg (pfile, arg)
      macro_arg *arg;
 {
   unsigned int capacity;
+  bool saved_warn_trad;
 
   if (arg->count == 0)
     return;
 
+  /* Don't warn about funlike macros when pre-expanding.  */
+  saved_warn_trad = CPP_WTRADITIONAL (pfile);
+  CPP_WTRADITIONAL (pfile) = 0;
+
   /* Loop, reading in the arguments.  */
   capacity = 256;
   arg->expanded = (const cpp_token **)
@@ -1062,6 +1067,8 @@ expand_arg (pfile, arg)
     }
 
   _cpp_pop_context (pfile);
+
+  CPP_WTRADITIONAL (pfile) = saved_warn_trad;
 }
 
 /* Pop the current context off the stack, re-enabling the macro if the
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/tr-warn2.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/tr-warn2.c,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 tr-warn2.c
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/tr-warn2.c	3 Jul 2002 02:41:33 -0000	1.2
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/tr-warn2.c	20 Sep 2002 18:20:55 -0000
@@ -1,14 +1,16 @@
 /* K+R rejects use of function-like macros in non-function context.
-   ANSI C explicitly permits this (the macro is not expanded).  */
+   ANSI C explicitly permits this (the macro is not expanded).
 
-/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options -Wtraditional } */
-
-enum { SIGN_EXTEND = 23 };
+   We should not warn about this during pre-expansion of arguments,
+   since traditional preprocessors don't do pre-expansion, and we get
+   the warning anyway during the re-scan pass if and only if it is
+   appropriate.  */
 
-#define SIGN_EXTEND(v) (((v) < 0) ? -1 : 0)
+/* { dg-do preprocess } */
+/* { dg-options -Wtraditional } */
 
-int fun()
-{
-  return SIGN_EXTEND;	/* { dg-warning "must be used with arguments" } */
-}
+#define f(x) x
+#define g(x) x / 2
+f(g) (3)	    /* { dg-bogus "must be used with arguments" } */
+f 2		    /* { dg-warning "must be used with arguments" } */
+f(g) 3		    /* { dg-warning "must be used with arguments" } */


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]