This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: Wno-warning-directives [WasRe: cpplib: Start moving ...]
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>, Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:40:19 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Wno-warning-directives [WasRe: cpplib: Start moving ...]
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Zack Weinberg wrote (to Mark Mitchell):
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:19:29AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> While in general I agree with you that we have too many options, I
> think that additional warning-control options are not nearly as
> problematic as others, since they are usually simple to implement,
> easy to document, have narrowly defined semantics, and do not affect
> code generation at all (modulo bugs). As long as we don't have a
> general mechanism for disabling individual warnings, I'm inclined to
> accede to requests for more finegrained -W options.
I read that as "let's accept the -Wno-warning-directives patch"
:-) and FWIW I agree to that, given your rationale.
brgds, H-P