This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libcall changes for the scheduler

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: "law at redhat dot com" <law at redhat dot com>, Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:34:08 -0700
Subject: Re: libcall changes for the scheduler

--On Monday, August 12, 2002 04:25:05 PM -0600 Jeff Law <law@porcupine.slc.redhat.com> wrote:

 In message <200208122056.21278@enzo.bigblue.local>, Franz Sirl writes:
 >> My memory is getting very fuzzy about which patches were directly
related  >> to this issue.  The only way to be sure is going to be to
slog through  >> the archives around the appropriate dates.  Here's my
best guess about  >> the relevant patches:
[ ... ]

 > This matches exactly the list of patches I compiled and tested. Should
I  > apply the appended patch to the branch after 3.2 is out?
Sounds reasonable to me if it's reasonable with Mark.

It is. :-)

Thanks!

--
Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- Re: libcall changes for the scheduler
  - From: Jeff Law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]