On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 05:37:52PM -0700, Stuart Hastings wrote:
I believe I've addressed almost every point raised thus far, either by
changing the code or with a counterexample or an explanation.
I don't see where you make the new function private to
the translation unit.
You're right, I haven't. I think my comment was accurate when I posted
it, but Mark raised this point, and Jason said it's illegal (and
probably immoral and fattening :-) to create extra copy-constructor
calls. The change for Mark is trivial; the fix for Jason will probably
be trivial, when I find the spot to apply it. :-)