This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH RFA] enable mangle6 for mipsisa64*-*-*
- From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>
- To: cgd at broadcom dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 03 Jul 2002 17:25:19 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH RFA] enable mangle6 for mipsisa64*-*-*
- References: <yov5ofdp8zc2.fsf@broadcom.com>
cgd@broadcom.com writes:
> I was looking at differences between mips64-elf and mipsisa64-elf
> testsuite run logs, and noticed that the mangle6 test was untested on
> the latter.
>
> It seems to work just fine. Is there some reason it isn't expected to
> work, or was this just an oversight?
No reason it shouldn't work. Just didn't know how to tell generically
if __attribute__ ((mode(TImode))) was supported, so I picked one set of
targets for which it does.
Hmm, seem to remember adding other mips64*-*-* cases as well...
yep, see gcc.dg/20020620-1.c.
Richard
> ===================================================================
> 2002-07-02 Chris Demetriou <cgd@broadcom.com>
>
> * g++.dg/abi/mangle6.C: Run for mipsisa64*-*-* targets.
>
> Index: g++.dg/abi/mangle6.C
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle6.C,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> diff -u -r1.1 mangle6.C
> --- g++.dg/abi/mangle6.C 13 Mar 2002 17:19:31 -0000 1.1
> +++ g++.dg/abi/mangle6.C 2 Jul 2002 23:48:06 -0000
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /* Check that __int128 types are mangled. */
> -/* { dg-do compile { target mips64*-*-* } } */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target mips64*-*-* mipsisa64*-*-* } } */
>
> typedef int int128 __attribute__ ((mode(TI)));
> typedef unsigned int uint128 __attribute__ ((mode(TI)));