This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
cgd@broadcom.com writes: > I was looking at differences between mips64-elf and mipsisa64-elf > testsuite run logs, and noticed that the mangle6 test was untested on > the latter. > > It seems to work just fine. Is there some reason it isn't expected to > work, or was this just an oversight? No reason it shouldn't work. Just didn't know how to tell generically if __attribute__ ((mode(TImode))) was supported, so I picked one set of targets for which it does. Hmm, seem to remember adding other mips64*-*-* cases as well... yep, see gcc.dg/20020620-1.c. Richard > =================================================================== > 2002-07-02 Chris Demetriou <cgd@broadcom.com> > > * g++.dg/abi/mangle6.C: Run for mipsisa64*-*-* targets. > > Index: g++.dg/abi/mangle6.C > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle6.C,v > retrieving revision 1.1 > diff -u -r1.1 mangle6.C > --- g++.dg/abi/mangle6.C 13 Mar 2002 17:19:31 -0000 1.1 > +++ g++.dg/abi/mangle6.C 2 Jul 2002 23:48:06 -0000 > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > /* Check that __int128 types are mangled. */ > -/* { dg-do compile { target mips64*-*-* } } */ > +/* { dg-do compile { target mips64*-*-* mipsisa64*-*-* } } */ > > typedef int int128 __attribute__ ((mode(TI))); > typedef unsigned int uint128 __attribute__ ((mode(TI)));
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |