This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: altivec is not the only simd arch

On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 12:55:46PM +0200, Daniel Egger wrote:
> This seems ambiguous to me, what exactly is the example supposed to
> produce and how will [certain] operators work on SIMD types?

You are reading too much into this.  It's not ambiguous at all.
If I write "int a,b; a + b", do I get saturated or truncating
addition?  The same applies to all your other questions.

We will not be overloading the standard operators for non-standard
operations.  Those will have to be acquired some other way.


r~
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]