This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.1 Released
- From: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
- To: Nicola Pero <nicola at brainstorm dot co dot uk>
- Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, shebs at apple dot com
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 13:43:53 +0200
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Released
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0205201222370.13389-100000@nicola.brainstorm.co.uk>
Nicola Pero <nicola@brainstorm.co.uk> writes:
>> >> > +<li>Loading of categories has been fixed in certain situations (GNU
>> >> > +runtime only).</li>
>> >> > +<li>The class lookup in the runtime library has been rewritten so that
>> >> > +class method dispatch is more than twice as fast as it used to be (GNU
>> >> > +runtime only).</li>
>> >>
>> >> IIRC, we agreed to use the spelling "run-time" (adjective), didn't we?
>>
>> > Ok - thanks - didn't know - the patch will use `run-time' then.
>>
>> Except that `GNU run time' (with or without a blank?)
>
> Ehmmm ... you don't seem to agree, do you ? :-)
I missed the second case, so Alexandre is correct: "GNU run time"
(noun) and "run-time library" (adjective) are the preferred forms.