This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: lang_expand_expr langhook
Richard Henderson wrote:-
> Previously, in the default case, we'd abort. Now it looks like
> we'll recurse and hit the default again. Not good.
OK, I'll have it abort. Thanks for spotting that.
> As for the expand_modifier thing... Hum. I don't _really_ like
> any of the solutions. Why don't we ignore the problem and make
> the fourth lang_hooks.expand_expr argument be an int?
Yes, I wondered about that.
Neil.