This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch to detect invalid and missing ATTRIBUTE const/pure [take 2]

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, dann at ics dot uci dot edu, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, john at feith dot com, mark at codesourcery dot com
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:45:21 -0800
Subject: Re: Patch to detect invalid and missing ATTRIBUTE const/pure [take 2]
References: <200203250554.AAA05644@caip.rutgers.edu> <20020325004601.A14556@redhat.com> <20020325210251.GE23331@codesourcery.com> <20020325130749.A15303@redhat.com> <20020326034653.GJ23331@codesourcery.com> <20020326141954.GD17157@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:19:54PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Will abort if we will allow dead code removal on loosened constant calls.
> Dead code removal is important feature. 

That's calling the function 0 times intead of 1.  The argument
so far has been 1 times instead of 0.


r~

References:
- Re: Patch to detect invalid and missing ATTRIBUTE const/pure [take 2]
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: Patch to detect invalid and missing ATTRIBUTE const/pure [take 2]
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Patch to detect invalid and missing ATTRIBUTE const/pure [take 2]
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Patch to detect invalid and missing ATTRIBUTE const/pure [take 2]
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Patch to detect invalid and missing ATTRIBUTE const/pure [take 2]
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Patch to detect invalid and missing ATTRIBUTE const/pure [take 2]
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]