This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Patch to detect invalid and missing ATTRIBUTE const/pure [take 2]

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 01:07:49PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 01:02:51PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > However, for safety's sake, it is starting to sound like we need
> > another attribute which indicates a const/pure function that does
> > not necessarily return...
> 
> No, please.  Let's just loosen the definition and audit
> the compiler for proper behaviour.

Fine by me - I thought you were advocating not loosening the
definition.

zw
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]