This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: sparc64 trampoline patch
- From: Brad Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>
- To: amacleod at cygnus dot com (Andrew Macleod)
- Cc: aoliva at redhat dot com, lucier at math dot purdue dot edu, amacleod at cygnus dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 21:28:49 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: sparc64 trampoline patch
>
> >> >> Im verifying it on the 3.1 branch right now, just to be sure
> >> >> before checking it in :-). The machine just isnt very fast...
> >>
> >> > I get a bootstrap failure on the 3.1 branch with your patch:
> >>
> >> > Bootstrap comparison failure!
> >> > java/gjavah.o differs
> >>
> >> I doubt it's this patch that is causing the bootstrap failure. Are
> >> you sure it's not something else?
>
> I couldn't bootstrap before the patch with mainline, but didn't
> try on 3.1. I also agree, I doubt this patch has caused the
> problem, it does clean up the testsuite quite a bit.
>
> I just commited it 3.1... then I read this. sigh. Should I uncommit it?
> Brad, did 3.1 bootstrap before this patch? Could you reverify this for me?
> Thanks
Even without your patch, I get comparison failures on the 3.1 branch:
Bootstrap comparison failure!
alias.o differs
expr.o differs
cp/semantics.o differs
The last "good" sparcv9 bootstrap I got on the 3.1 branch was February 25, so
I don't know where the problem was introduced; I've been testing the
mainline since then. (Good is in quotation marks, since this is the
test with all the fails and unresolveds that you were trying to fix.)
Brad