This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Segmentation fault in C++ demangle
- From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at attbi dot com>
- To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- Cc: jason at redhat dot com, nickc at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:28:50 -0500
- Subject: Re: Segmentation fault in C++ demangle
- References: <m3k7uq8dxi.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com> <20020112152750.A312@mediaone.net> <m3k7um1xuk.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com> <200201141836.g0EIaJY11429@greed.delorie.com> <wvl6664bwfc.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <200201141907.g0EJ70J11953@greed.delorie.com> <20020218011942.A19088@attbi.com> <200202181517.g1IFHxL26161@greed.delorie.com>
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:17:59AM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > Was the following patch approved?
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-01/msg01047.html
>
> Last I heard, the code is the way it is because of "backward
> compatibility" and nobody made an authoritative decision about it.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-01/msg01135.html
Do we have consensus on what to do?
Jason said it is OK here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-02/msg01189.html
Is it OK with you, since you are the libiberty maintainer?
Thanks.
--
Craig Rodrigues
http://www.gis.net/~craigr
rodrigc@attbi.com