This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: sh64-elf (SH5) port
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>,"gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 16:43:48 -0000
- Subject: Re: sh64-elf (SH5) port
--On Monday, February 04, 2002 9:34 AM -0200 Alexandre Oliva
<aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Could you store that data somewhere else?
>
> Sure. In fact, it doesn't really have to be stored anywhere
I'm sorry; I may have misread your original posting. (Right now, I'm in an
airport so I can't check easily.) If the additional field is only present
in the record_layout_info, and not in the tree data structures, don't sweat
it -- just put it in unconditionally, but with a comment indicating when
it's used.
> Ideally, a field would have a direct pointer to its predecessor, so we
> wouldn't have to make this information artificially available.
Maybe. Although, you don't generally need that link; keeping this data out
of the tree structure is probably worth it.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com