This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Segmentation fault in C++ demangle

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: jason at redhat dot com
Cc: nickc at redhat dot com, rodrigc at mediaone dot net, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:07:00 -0500
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault in C++ demangle
References: <m3k7uq8dxi.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com><20020112152750.A312@mediaone.net><m3k7um1xuk.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com><200201141836.g0EIaJY11429@greed.delorie.com> <wvl6664bwfc.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com>


> >> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-gnu-utils/2002-01/txt00001.txt 
> >> 
> >> I guess DJ can decide if this test is suitable.
> 
> > I'll let a C++ expert decide that ;-)
> 
> Uh, sure.  :)  I don't really feel like checking it by hand, especially
> since it's for the old demangler...

Ok, then I'll say "it's ok if it's testing a segfault bug".  We should
*never* segfault because of bad input, but if we're not interested in
what it's demangled into then I feel OK approving it.

References:
- Re: Segmentation fault in C++ demangle
  - From: Craig Rodrigues
- Re: Segmentation fault in C++ demangle
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: Segmentation fault in C++ demangle
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Segmentation fault in C++ demangle
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]