This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Clarify rules for testing patches

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 10:49:14 -0800
Subject: Re: Clarify rules for testing patches
References: <20020103202523.GB11414@codesourcery.com> <Pine.BSF.4.43.0201041055440.73469-100000@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 11:05:00AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

> > -<blockquote><code>
> > +<blockquote>
> > +<pre>
> 
> Was there any specific reason for thischange?  I'm asking because I
> had intentionally used <blockquote><code> instead of <blockquote><pre>,
> because overall the former produced better results with those browsers
> I had tested.

<blockquote><code> doesn't validate; it wants to see
<blockquote><p><code>, which renders exactly the same as
<blockquote><pre> in the (small) set of browsers I tried.  And since
there were other places that used <blockquote><pre>, I thought
consistency would be nice.

zw

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Clarify rules for testing patches
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

References:
- Re: Clarify rules for testing patches
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Clarify rules for testing patches
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]