This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [testcase] Failure with "per insn lexical block tracking" patch
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 12:46:40 -0500
- Subject: Re: [testcase] Failure with "per insn lexical block tracking" patch
- References: <20011230202829.A3335@redhat.com> <20020102075720.X4087@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20020102094058.A8424@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:40:58AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 07:57:20AM -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > +/* { dg-do compile { target alpha*-*-* } } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -g -mcpu=ev5" } */
>
> Probably better as
>
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> /* { dg-options "-O2 -g" } */
> /* { dg-options "-mcpu=ev4" { target "alpha*-*-*" } } */
>
> Anyway, I think I have a fix for this.
Great. Just wondering, is it making sure no block notes are lost during
scope_to_insns_initialize or on the dwarf2out size handling case where block
notes were lost?
Jakub