This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Fix for g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb130.C
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 10:23:18 -0500
- Subject: Re: Fix for g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb130.C
- References: <3C307FB0.3398F345@unitus.it>
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 04:09:36PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> I inadvertently caused this regression. Currently this test, which is just:
>
> #include <ext/hash_set>
> std::hash_set<int> foo;
>
> is obviously failing, since hash_set is now in __gnu_cxx.
> The fix is trivial, but only someone with write access to gcc/testsuite can
> commit it.
Actually, you have write access to gcc/testsuite. And since this patch
is both 1) an obvious fix, and 2) a solution for a regression that you
(accidentally) caused yourself, you can commit it without any further
approval.
Phil
--
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams