This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: fix kennerism
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>
- Cc: <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 17:47:11 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: fix kennerism
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Richard Kenner wrote:
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -O2
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -O3 -g
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -Os
> As most people doing regression tests have noticed (except on the
> fastest machines and fastest disks with no system load), those FAILs
> come and go depending on system load.
> No, they *always* FAIL for me.
Perhaps it goes without saying, but anyways: if you locate the
dial on your hardware that says "MHz" and crank it up a few
hundred notches, you'll see that those tests *can* succeed. :-)