This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Re: scheduling vs lexical scopes

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 11:50:40 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: scheduling vs lexical scopes
References: <20011227151618.A31660@redhat.com> <wvlwuz757xw.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <20011228151529.A10303@redhat.com> <20011229144512.C4087@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 02:45:12PM -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 	* cfglayout.c (insert_intra_before_1): New.
> 	(insert_inter_bb_scope_notes): Emit sibling block notes which don't
> 	span multiple basic blocks.
> 
> 	* gcc.dg/debug-3.c: New test.
> 	* gcc.dg/debug-4.c: New test.
> 	* gcc.dg/debug-5.c: New test.

Ok.


r~

References:
- scheduling vs lexical scopes
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: scheduling vs lexical scopes
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: scheduling vs lexical scopes
  - From: Richard Henderson
- [PATCH] Re: scheduling vs lexical scopes
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]