This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix initialization by compound literal (was Re: [PATCH] Allow compound literals in static storage duration object initializers)

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 09:52:12 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix initialization by compound literal (was Re: [PATCH] Allow compound literals in static storage duration object initializers)
References: <20011212115310.I1017@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112121853090.26483-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> <20011212124631.A25322@redhat.com> <20011227184511.D15801@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 06:45:11PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 	* c-typeck.c (store_init_value): If initializing object with array
> 	type of unknown size by a compound literal, set object's size from
> 	compound literal size.
> 	* doc/extend.texi (Compound Literals): Adjust documentation.
> 
> 	* gnu89-init-1.c: Adjust for the new behaviour, add some additional
> 	tests.

Ok.


r~

References:
- [PATCH] Allow compound literals in static storage duration object initializers
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Allow compound literals in static storage duration objectinitializers
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [PATCH] Allow compound literals in static storage duration object initializers
  - From: Richard Henderson
- [PATCH] Fix initialization by compound literal (was Re: [PATCH] Allow compound literals in static storage duration object initializers)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]