This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Unreviewed patch (was Re: Freeze timing and questions)
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: Bob Wilson <bwilson at tensilica dot com>
- Cc: <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 22:02:46 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: Unreviewed patch (was Re: Freeze timing and questions)
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Bob Wilson wrote:
> Sorry, I am new at this. I hadn't recently bootstrapped the mainline
> sources with my patches, but I have done that now. It bootstraps
> successfully for i686-pc-linux-gnu, and the C and C++ test results match
> the results when I don't include my patches.
> I also tried to bootstrap it for sparc-sun-solaris2.7. It behaves
> exactly the same with and without my patches (seg fault in xgcc while
> configuring libstdc++-v3).
> I hope that is sufficient, as I don't have other systems on which to test.
Since you put it that way, you *also* have at least three
simulator systems using easy-to-follow descriptions:
Five are listed, but arm and mips weren't working yesterday,
leaving m32r, mn10300 and powerpc. On the other hand there are
some others that don't support some languages:
h8300-hms+h8300-sim that requires --enable-languages=objc (to
exclude non-working C++ and Fortran parts; C is always included)
and i960-coff+i960-sim that requires --enable-languages=c++,f77
(to exclude a non-working Objective C part).
(For the record: sh and mcore still needed just one
reload-related patch to work last time I looked. No, I don't
have the URL to the unreviewed patch handy right now.)