This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add target hook in C front end


>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph S Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> writes:

 > (b) It is well-established that __SIZE_TYPE__ is a macro, not a
 > typedef,

but that's just because it's always been done that way.  It doesn't
mean we have to continue doing it that way, especially after having
looked at the mips specs attrocity which IMHO are completely
unreadable, let alone maintainable.

 > example, relied on in the format checking tests to determine the
 > corresponding signed type.  Did your patch pass c99-scanf-1.c?

Assuming eric's patch does not pass c99-scanf-1.c, can't the tests be
fixed to work without a dependency on explicit types (ie, not typedefs
as eric's patch introduces)?

 > -- 
 > Joseph S. Myers
 > jsm28@cam.ac.uk


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]