This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Volatile MEMs in statement expressions and functions inlined as trees
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at transmeta dot com>
- Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 14 Dec 2001 20:37:08 +0100
- Subject: Re: Volatile MEMs in statement expressions and functions inlined as trees
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <Pine.LNX.email@example.com>
Linus Torvalds <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
| But I'm saying that it _is_ sensible, and the way to make it sensible is
| to realize that the standard mentions "result" _three_ times, and that
| they are different _parts_ of the result. I claim that the different parts
| of the result are it's type, it's rvalue, and it's lvalue.
What you're saying is inconsistent with other part of the language. I
already posted an example which you ignored.
| And I'm telling you that your world-view is too limited.
If you do really think that my world-view is too limited, then you're
holding a self-contradictory position.
| The earth is not flat, it's round.
Is that the last lesson you learnt from your new book? Good. But
that is not news.