This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C++ pcc struct return fix


> Did we ever reach resolution on this issue?

No.

> In particular, did we get a patch approved for the mainline?  For
> the 3.0 branch?  Is there a patch that needs review, but that hasn't
> been reviewed?  (If so, send it to me, and I will review it.)

Jason approved the patch to semantics.c but asked that the comment
about DIRECT_BIND in cp-tree.h reflect this usage.  So, I sent this
update.

<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-12/msg00209.html>,

Is this OK?  Jason didn't say anything about the branch in his response.

Personally, the reason that I would like this on the branch is that
it takes about half the memory to build as the main, and thus is
better suited to machines with small amounts of memory.  However,
getting it in 3.0.3 isn't an urgent priority, particularly if a
3.0.4 is planned.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]