This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PR 5041, zero-length arrays initialized by []; cause gcc-3.0 to segfault


On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 04:05:30PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> >  
> >  Instead GCC allows static initialization of flexible array members.
> >  This is equivalent to defining a new structure containing the original
> 
> I know this isn't your patch, but the paragraph that follows the change 
> above doesn't really make sense now.
> 
> 	Instead...
> 
> Instead of what? Maybe the "Instead" should just be removed.


There are two issues here:
    (1) Is this patch OK to merge to branch?
    (2) Should the wording of the patch to extend.texi be changed?

I'm not sure how to deal with (2), maybe the author
of the patch, DJ Delorie, would like to comment.

I would like clarification of (1).
-- 
Craig Rodrigues        
http://www.gis.net/~craigr    
rodrigc@mediaone.net          


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]