This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] Resubmission in an attempt to get someones attention


I had forgotten that it only affected interaction with another compiler;
I should have looked at your original message again.

Janis

On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 01:16:20PM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> I am not quite sure how to write a test for this.  Tests that involve
> just GCC will work before and after the changes because while the
> parameter passing/returns was done "wrong" with respect to the ABI they
> were done consistently within GCC.  It is in the interaction between GCC
> and HP C that the problem arises but I don't believe that GCC supports
> that type of test involving GCC and the system compiler.
> 
> I suppose I could write a simple structure passing / returning test that
> at least makes sure GCC still works in general and that nothing broke,
> but it wouldn't be testing that this change had the intended affect.  Do
> you think that would be useful?
> 
> Steve Ellcey
> sje@cup.hp.com
> 
> > If someone (Jim?) approves this I'll volunteer to commit the changes
> > after running a bootstrap and test run on ia64-linux.
> > 
> > This probably deserves at least one new test, even if it only affects
> > ia64-hpux.
> > 
> > Janis


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]