This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bootstrap broken
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- To: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:03:16 -0500
- Subject: Re: Bootstrap broken
- References: <10112061936.AA02860@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 02:36:48PM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote:
> You might consider automating more of this with a script.
> I did, but the risk there is higher. It's far worse to commit *more* than
> was intended than to commit less. The latter case is easily noticed and
> corrected but the former is not.
I said "automating more of this," not automating /all/ of it. :-)
> There are certain things I feel *much* safer doing manually and applying
> patches is one of them.
That's why a good patch-committing script does a 'cvs diff' for /another/
visual last-minute inspection, and waits for human approval before actually
calling 'cvs commit' with a generated (but human-approved) command line.
I'm recommending automating the tedious tasks, not the decision making.
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams