This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Redundant tree inliner code?


Ziemowit Laski wrote:-

> A recursive grep for deferred_fns (which I believe came in with the new
> tree inlining recently) shows that the variable is defined in three
> different places.  Is there a reason for this, or could it just go
> into c-common.[ch]?
> 
> We stumbled across this while working on our persistent front-end, and
> the current "distribution" of deferred_fns makes life extra hellish
> for us. :)

I have a patch towards remedying this that is still waiting approval:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-11/msg01924.html

There's a lot of redundant code; I'm sure this is just the tip of the
iceberg.

Neil.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]