This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Volatile MEMs in statement expressions and functions inlined as trees


On Dec  4, 2001, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:

> Anyway, I'm to the point of reverting this patch.  It's rendered the
> C++ compiler pretty much useless :-(

> If I don't manage to fix it in the next 2-3 hours, I'll revert the
> patch set (along with your patch).

Actually, I'm reverting it right now.  I've just got a report from
Andrew Haley that made it clear that my fix is far from enough to get
volatile MEMs fixed, at least in the case of functions inlined as
trees, and, if I'm reading it right, also in statement expressions.
So, I'll rework the patch and post a revised version, hopefully soon.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]