This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix ASM_DEBUG_SPEC definition

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, geoffk at redhat dot com, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:29:22 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ASM_DEBUG_SPEC definition
References: <jeelmk1cao.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20011127221430.I572@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20011127142029.B30182@redhat.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:20:29PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 10:14:30PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > 	* gcc.c (ASM_DEBUG_SPEC): Use conditional expression rather than
> > 	preprocessor define.  If only DBX_DEBUGGING_INFO or only
> > 	DWARF2_DEBUGGING_INFO is supported for the target, provide
> > 	appropriate definitions.
> 
> Does K&R fold constant ?: in variable initializations?

I don't know. I have tried gcc -traditional -W -Wall, but that doesn't say
anything.
Can anyone with a truly K&R compiler test it out?

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix ASM_DEBUG_SPEC definition
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- PREFERRED_DEBUGGING_FORMAT -> PREFERRED_DEBUGGING_TYPE
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- [PATCH] Fix ASM_DEBUG_SPEC definition
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Fix ASM_DEBUG_SPEC definition
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]