This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: fix code alignment

To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, mats dot petersson at amd dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: fix code alignment
From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 00:51:40 +0100
References: <20011108153257.A684@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20011109111429.A6258@redhat.com>

> On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 03:32:57PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > !       align_loops = 1 << abs (processor_target_table[ix86_cpu].align_loop);
> > !       align_loops_max_skip = processor_target_table[ix86_cpu].align_loop_max_skip;
> 
> I think its confusing to have one number encoded as a power 
> of two and the other number not encoded.  And the abs isn't
> needed anymore.
I was thining about that too, but I decided to keep th scheme
because it is used consistenly over i386.c, but I guess it is
better to slowly switch the other cases too.

I will install it with the values recomputed.

Honza
> 
> Otherwise ok.
> 
> 
> r~

References:
- fix code alignment
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: fix code alignment
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]