This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ error printer cleanup, phase 1
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 06:43:44PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> If variadic macros were a feature of K+R C, or if it were possible to
> write an inline variadic wrapper function that handed off to a
> different variadic function (instead of a function that takes a
> va_list argument), that would be a different story. Then one set of
> routines could be defined in terms of the other.
Yet another good argument for dropping K&R C as a bootstrapping compiler,
and going with the, "If you only have a K&R C compiler, first bootstrap
GCC 3.0, and then use that to bootstrap GCC 3.blah" approach.
Slowly pushing for GCC to move into the 21st century, :-)
Phil
--
"You have to wonder what kind of life you have when your list of personal
rules begins with, '#3: No drowning in your own mucus,' and '#4: Don't
ask what happened to rules 1 and 2.'"
- References:
- C++ error printer cleanup, phase 1
- Re: C++ error printer cleanup, phase 1
- Re: C++ error printer cleanup, phase 1
- Re: C++ error printer cleanup, phase 1
- Re: C++ error printer cleanup, phase 1
- Re: C++ error printer cleanup, phase 1
- Re: C++ error printer cleanup, phase 1
- Re: C++ error printer cleanup, phase 1
- Re: C++ error printer cleanup, phase 1
- Re: C++ error printer cleanup, phase 1