This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it)
- To: geoffk at geoffk dot org
- Subject: Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it)
- From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:41:04 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu
> From: Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
>
> "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:
>
> > Thus IMHO, we should only enable -Werror in stage2 or later. However
> > this means if you don't do a full bootstrap (e.g. cross-compiles or
> > building for embedded targets) then -Werror isn't in effect. This
> > also means the automatic tester to powerpc won't detect regressions.
>
> That's OK. The automatic tester also does an x86-linux bootstrap.
Oh yes, way cool. I had forgotten about that. :-)
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi Engagement Manager / Project Services
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Qwest Internet Solutions