This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: RFC: BB duplication code

To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Subject: Re: RFC: BB duplication code
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:19:07 -0700
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, patches at x86-64 dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010822202900.D30704@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20010822121440.H29601@redhat.com> <20010822212756.G30704@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20010822130404.K29601@redhat.com> <20010823154400.A4372@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 03:44:00PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> This means that when I am duplicating BB that starts BLOCK_BEG in the
> middle, I can easilly add an paired BLOCK_END at the end of basic block
> and get info correct?

Not quite.  There are some data strucures that need updating.
See the end of relate_bbs_with_scopes.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: BB duplication code
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- RFC: BB duplication code
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: RFC: BB duplication code
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: RFC: BB duplication code
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: RFC: BB duplication code
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: RFC: BB duplication code
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]