RE: [g77 testsuite] Some command line options tests

["Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com>]

Apologies

I know I tested them.  I must have sent the files from the working
directory, rather than final versions I tested. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Toon Moene [SMTP:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl]
> Sent:	Friday, 3 August 2001 5:42
> To:	Jeffrey Oldham
> Cc:	Billinghurst, David (CRTS); gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject:	Re: [g77 testsuite] Some command line options tests
> 
> Jeffrey Oldham wrote:
> 
> > The new g77 testcases are great, but my gcc 3.1 i686-pc-linux-gnu
> > build tripped over the new regression test
> > gcc/testsuite/g77.dg/ff90-1.f.  If my conjecture that the wrong
> > variable is used in the s() subroutine is correct, will you please
> > apply the attached patch?  If not, we need to fix 3.1's execution on
> > i686-pc-linux-gnu; any ideas?
> 
> *** ff90-1.f    2001/08/01 20:35:59     1.1
> --- ff90-1.f    2001/08/02 17:47:30
> *************** C { dg-options "-ff90" }
> *** 11,15 ****
>         end
>         subroutine s(x)
>         double precision x
> !       if ( abs(z-2.0d0) .gt. 1.0e-5 ) call abort
>         end
> --- 11,15 ----
>         end
>         subroutine s(x)
>         double precision x
> !       if ( abs(x-2.0d0) .gt. 1.0e-5 ) call abort
>         end
> 
> GRRRR, did I say I reviewed this ?
> 
> [ Buries head in hands, wailing ... ]
> 
> I'll fix it, shortly.
> 
> -- 
> Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
> Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
> Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
> Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)