This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Patch: validate_replace_rtx_1 fix

To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Subject: Re: Patch: validate_replace_rtx_1 fix
From: Roman Zippel <zippel at linux-m68k dot org>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 23:23:22 +0200
CC: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107280338490.8869-100000@serv> <20010728202503.C25604@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <3B63234A.86352D77@linux-m68k.org> <20010728224257.T25604@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <3B632619.3CA30C34@linux-m68k.org> <20010728225908.U25604@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

Hi,

Jan Hubicka wrote:

> I guess proper fix is following.  We don't need to mess with op0_mode
> at all and simply use the mode of the expression, as MINUS requires these
> to match.  If it solves the problem I will bootstrap/regtest i686 it
> and install as obvious.

It's ok for me, with my version of the patch I'm just past compare. :-)

bye, Roman

References:
- Patch: validate_replace_rtx_1 fix
  - From: Roman Zippel
- Re: Patch: validate_replace_rtx_1 fix
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Patch: validate_replace_rtx_1 fix
  - From: Roman Zippel
- Re: Patch: validate_replace_rtx_1 fix
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Patch: validate_replace_rtx_1 fix
  - From: Roman Zippel
- Re: Patch: validate_replace_rtx_1 fix
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]