This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFA]: Fix a problem in merge_assigned_reloads
- To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- Subject: Re: [RFA]: Fix a problem in merge_assigned_reloads
- From: Stephane Carrez <Stephane dot Carrez at worldnet dot fr>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 22:48:23 +0200
- CC: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <3B4A15F0.E60C05D8@worldnet.fr> <jmlmlx9t8i.fsf@geoffk.org>
Hi!
Geoff Keating a écrit :
>
> Stephane Carrez <Stephane.Carrez@worldnet.fr> writes:
>
> ...
> > Can you approve or integrate this patch in 3_0 and 3_1?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stephane
> >
> > 2001-07-09 Stephane Carrez <Stephane.Carrez@worldnet.fr>
> >
> > * reload1.c (merge_assigned_reloads): After a RELOAD_OTHER merge,
> > fix the setting of the reloads of that reload to RELOAD_FOR_OTHER_ADDRESS.
>
> This patch is approved for the mainline, assuming you have tested it
> on some platform and you forgot to mention that in your mail.
Thanks!
Of course! I detected the problem with HC11 target and verified the fix;
the test that failed was testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/991016-1.c
(with some others).
>
> I am not sure about the branch. Does it fix a regression from GCC 2.95?
>
> --
> - Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
The problem is also in 2.95. Since the m6811 is not in 2.95 (except as patches)
we can't speak of a regression.
I need this for 3_0, could you approve it for that branch too?
Stephane