This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [patch] New c-torture testcases.

To: Jeffrey Oldham <oldham at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: [patch] New c-torture testcases.
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 10:42:24 -0400
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <200105262214.PAA18432@oz.codesourcery.com> <20010526225425.B30340@tornado.cygnus.com> <20010527184025.C2351@codesourcery.com>

On Sun, 27 May 2001, Jeffrey Oldham wrote:

> Agreed, the code should compile.
> 
> May we revise the test to only compile, not link?  The test may break
> native assemblers for which testing is not a purpose of the gcc
> testsuite.
> 
Well, the program shouldn't link. It's in the compile/ directory.
But, yes I agree that we shouldn't be breaking native assemblers.

Maybe we should setup a .x file to mark it xfail when not using
GAS? I'm afraid I don't know my way through dejagnu well enough
to do that, though.

Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- RFA: Do not assemble c-torture testcase
  - From: Jeffrey Oldham

References:
- Re: [patch] New c-torture testcases.
  - From: Jeffrey Oldham
- Re: [patch] New c-torture testcases.
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [patch] New c-torture testcases.
  - From: Jeffrey Oldham

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]