This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Proposed fix for unrrecognizable insn ICE
- To: Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com
- Subject: Re: Proposed fix for unrrecognizable insn ICE
- From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 16:58:37 -0700
- CC: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <200104302217.SAA26626@makai.watson.ibm.com> <01050200260900.11376@enzo.bigblue.local> <200105020201.TAA19776@geoffk.org> <01051801413700.01580@enzo.bigblue.local>
- Reply-to: Geoff Keating <geoffk at redhat dot com>
> From: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 01:41:37 +0200
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>
> On Wednesday 02 May 2001 04:01, Geoff Keating wrote:
> > > From: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>
> > > Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 00:26:09 +0200
> > > Done. I append both patches to be applied in sequence.
> >
> > OK. The convert-to-function patch is approved.
> >
> > After thinking about it, I think the actual change is OK too. So
> > let's try it, too, on the mainline for a week or so and then on the
> > branch if no-one complains.
>
> No-one complained so I moved it to the branch too.
>
> What about your -fpic fix? It bootstraps the branch fine and compiles glibc
> without problems. Shouuld I move it to the branch too?
Yes. I'm pretty sure it's fixing a regression from 2.95.
--
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>