This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] expr.c:emit_push_insn

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] expr.c:emit_push_insn
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 15:11:08 -0700
Cc: dje at watson dot ibm dot com, "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot Rutgers dot EDU>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <200105102154.RAA30392@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20010510150808Z.mitchell@codesourcery.com>

On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 03:08:08PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> This bug is happenning a lot -- it would be good if we had
> bit_alignment and byte_alignment types (typedef'd to `int') that could
> be used for self-documentation.

All alignments are supposed to be in bits.  The confusion here is
that PUSH_ROUNDING isn't actually dealing with alignment at all.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] expr.c:emit_push_insn
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [PATCH] expr.c:emit_push_insn
  - From: David Edelsohn

References:
- [PATCH] expr.c:emit_push_insn
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH] expr.c:emit_push_insn
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]