This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Disappearing labels fix
- To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Subject: Re: Disappearing labels fix
- From: law at redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 15:48:32 -0700
- cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Reply-To: law at redhat dot com
In message <01050200330901.11376@enzo.bigblue.local>you write:
> On Tuesday 01 May 2001 01:00, law@redhat.com wrote:
> > In message <01043015572800.21472@enzo.bigblue.local>you write:
> > > Just a followup, with Java disabled I get the following regressions
> > > with -fPIC:
> > >
> > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001221-1.c, -O2
> > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001221-1.c, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001221-1.c, -O3 -g
> > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001221-1.c, -Os
> > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010106-1.c compilation, -O3
> > > -fomit-frame-pointer
> > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010106-1.c compilation, -O3 -g
> > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/980707-1.c compilation, -O1
> > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/980707-1.c compilation, -O2
> > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/980707-1.c compilation, -O3
> > > -fomit-frame-point er
> > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/980707-1.c compilation, -O3
> > > -fomit-frame-point er
> > > -funroll-loops
> > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/980707-1.c compilation, -O3
> > > -fomit-frame-point er
> > > -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
> > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/980707-1.c compilation, -O3 -g
> > > FAIL: gcc.dg/switch-1.c (test for excess errors)
> >
> > Thanks. From looking at things, I suspect that this stuff would probably
> > fail with gcc-2.95.x in a similar manner.
>
> No, this was the case with the first version Bernd applied and the
> reverted again. The current version in 2_95 works annd tests fine for
> me so far.
I don't see how it could be working, but I'll build a 2.95 branch and
see if I can figure out why it's working.
> Hehe, I guess it's even more difficultt than you thought, no patch
> committed yet? :-)
More a function of getting "distracted" by a number of things this week
(including getting the sourceware machine upgraded).
jeff