This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: MS-style bit-field placement


On Apr 15, 2001, David Korn <dkorn@pixelpower.com> wrote:

> I don't have a copy of the language spec to hand, but IIRC the effects of
> BITFIELD_SAME_TYPE_SIZE would contradict the standard layout rules for
> bitfields, and so there should probably be some dependency of your patches
> on the -ansi (and other language spec selecting) flags ?

Hmm...  I'd rather leave it up to the definition of these macros to
take -ansi into account.  It's a matter of ABI, and, if the aim is to
be compatible with a certain ABI, we shouldn't hard-code anything that
would make it harder.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]