Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>

[Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>]

Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes:

| Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel.Dos-Reis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr> writes:
| 
| > Where should we put those? In the global namespace or in the std::?
| > 
| > Strictly speaking, we're not allowed to put them in the global
| > namespace.
| 
| You'll have to face it: the C++ people screwed up big time by not
| looking forward to C99 and in advance making decisions about the
| extensions.  Sooner or later all the definitions will be in std:: and
| the sooner this is done the better.  I really would prefer not to see
| a namespace isoc99::.  But if you think it is necessary allow some
| mode where std:: includes isoc99::.

I do not have any strong feeling but std::isoc99:: seems a good idea.
Later, we could bring them into std::.

The question is to come up with solutions which makes us comply to the
standard and at the same time not being out-of-date with respect to
C99.

-- Gaby