This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: PATCH: Current incarnation of subreg-byte

To: Ben Collins <bcollins at debian dot org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Current incarnation of subreg-byte
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 17:43:04 -0800
Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, Andrew Macleod <amacleod at cygnus dot com>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <200103072054.MAA09383@rtl.cygnus.com> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0103090005120.12151-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20010308161651.A12473@redhat.com> <20010308204107.C2022@visi.net>

On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 08:41:07PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> Would such a way still be ABI compatible with code generated by the
> subreg-byte changes? If so, I'd be interested in this less invasive way.

Yes.


r~

References:
- PATCH: Current incarnation of subreg-byte
  - From: Andrew Macleod
- Re: PATCH: Current incarnation of subreg-byte
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: PATCH: Current incarnation of subreg-byte
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: PATCH: Current incarnation of subreg-byte
  - From: Ben Collins

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]