This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Patch for automaton based pipeline hazard recognizer (part #1).


On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>
>   As for minimal cost, the current scheduler doesn't take into account
> that there are processors where insn latency is zero (of course
> logically).  We could make that the scheduler using old pipeline
> interface also could be adequate to such processors.

What are the problems with that?  I just ran into a case where priority()
would take exponential time, but other than that I don't see any problems.
The ia64 machine description has a few insns with zero latency.


Bernd


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]